|
Posting | Category | Comments |
| The
Naked Chef blog
|
Blogging |
I wonder if Food Network will bite the blogging pepper soon? |
| The
whole picture |
Blogging |
But let's be clear: the whole picture, by definition,
cannot be authorized. |
| Barbecued
Broccoli |
Blogging |
That does sound really good. |
| What
color is the sky in your world? |
Blogging |
Make Linux much easier to install and use by the average
user. Then you stand a chance. Instead of bashing Microsoft, look at when they
do well and try to improve on that and look at what Microsoft does poorly and
try to make it better in your offering.
|
| Chris
Adams' Blog |
Blogging |
I've had the pleasure of having a beer with Chris. If his
blog is half as cool as he is, its going to be great. SUBSCRIBED! |
| There's
no such thing as a simple feature |
Dev |
Here's a great slice of how software development really
works at Microsoft. No video, no fluff, just great stuff. Thanks for the
insight, KC! |
| Create
context menu items in IE (a wish from cerkit.com) |
Dev |
Jeez, Philip, you are on fire! Nice job! Guess that sort of
disproves KC's post... (grin) |
| Defining
Interfaces |
Dev |
Nice, brief tutorial. |
| Sql
Server Books Online 2004 Update |
Dev |
Well, here we go again. Fetch! |
| A
late rant, but a rant none the less |
Otherwise |
Pretty much sums up how I feel about Iron Chef America. |
| Laptop
configuration and tools |
Otherwise |
I like these Best Practices. |
| My
latest ultimate dream television show would be ... |
Otherwise |
Oh yeah, that would rule. |
| whether
or not you're a cat lover, you'll(...) |
Otherwise |
The Vulcan IDIC: Infinite Diversity in Infinite Cats? |
| "Find
nearby Places" is the killer app for Microsoft MapPoint |
Otherwise |
Its funny how much Michael and I think alike. |
| My
regex cheatsheet |
SQL |
Well, isn't that helpful? |
| VS2005:
Visual Guide to Windows Forms 2.0 |
WILY |
WebBrower control. Nice. We need that. |
| SQL
Server 2005: DBAs and Developers- Or, "Will They Let Us Play With Our New
Toys?" |
WILY |
My point is that for SQL Server 2005 to avoid ending up as a product with lots
of very useful features that nobody ever gets to use, Microsoft need to
communicate with DBAs to address not just the cool database stuff (which I
think they're doing quite well already), but also to fill them in on the brave
new world of managed code, coming to a server near you soon.
Sounds like what I've been saying for months.
|
| Very
interesting thing about XML schema support in SQL Server 2005 |
WILY |
Witness the power of blogging! |
| XML
Schema evolution in SQL Server 2005 (Yukon) |
WILY |
Ask and you shall be answered. This is good news and I'm
hoping Michael will talk more about this at TechEd. |
| Some
comments on “Kiss the Middle-tier Goodbye with SQL Server Yukon” |
WILY |
Very meaty post, well worth reading. |
| Setting
XML support in SQL Server 2000 into perspective |
WILY |
In summary, the step from SQL Server 2000 to 2005 (w/r/t
to XML) has to be seen as an evolution and not a revolution.
|
| What
to call a conforming instance of an XML datatype |
WILY |
#5 seems most correct to me. |
| SQL
Server 2005: Helping DBAs to love and trust managed code as we do |
WILY |
The problem I see is that it's going to be a big sell to
DBAs, and if the case is not convincingly made then we are going to find all
that lovely functionality locked off and unavailable.
|